| Author | Topic |
|---|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
|
rasmussen81
Posts: 6064
Registered:
July 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 27 May 2012 21:25
 
|
 |
| deemao wrote on Sun, 27 May 2012 23:19 |
As promised, here I present the Campaign Book vol. 1 Errata document:
http://cdn.daysofwonder.com/uploads/userpages/713928/_5549.p df
If you find any mistakes or misunderstandings, let me know and I will correct it. This applies especially to experienced players or campaigns designers themselves. At last I would like to thank Stevens for help.
The errata document for CB vol. 2 will be presented next Sunday.
|
Very nice work!! Those look great. There will be a lot of players (including me) happy to have the document to print out and tuck into the front of the book so that all the errors are in one place...and you made it look good while you were at it.
Thanks for your hard work! 
|
|
|
Almilcar
Posts: 649
Registered:
November 2011
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 27 May 2012 22:48
|
|
Thanks Deemao!
Invaluable document 
|
|
|
Panzer20
Posts: 17
Registered:
January 2006
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 04:43
|
|
|
Thank you so much! This is a great contribution to the M44 community. It really is helpful to have something like this to insert in the book.
|
|
|
Yallow
Posts: 19
Registered:
May 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 05:41
|
|
+1
Thanks so much!!!
|
|
|
eldonion
Posts: 159
Registered:
December 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 08:44
|
|
|
Your work is appreciated
|
|
|
sdnative
Posts: 384
Registered:
February 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 08:54
|
|
Thank you so much!! 
|
|
|
50th
Posts: 1277
Registered:
October 2006
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 13:02
|
|
|
Thank you Thank you!
|
|
|
Jaykay2010
Posts: 485
Registered:
November 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 14:42
|
|
This is excellent ... very handy to have in one place!
I may have spotted a slight error ...
The final correction in the Battle of Normandy Campaign, which mentions the extra point for a FOURTH objective ..
I wasn't aware you gained 3 points for only securing 3 objectives, as you state.
Currently in the book, it is 2 points for 3 objectives.
The missing objective, ie the 4th objective, is worth the additional point.
Therefore the statement:
''Right amount of points on the Objective track for Allies is 3, if they gain 3 or 4 objectives'', is not strictly correct as far as I can see?
Could anyone confirm this?
Cheers
Jim
|
|
|
Jaykay2010
Posts: 485
Registered:
November 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 14:47
|
|
Also, one other thing I've just noticed, (im going throught the Normandy campaign as it goes ) ..
At Mont Pincon (Early Falaise), I'm assuming the Axis forces start with a medal toward their six, as they hold Mont Pincon.
Should this be reflected in the scenario ?
Cheers
Jim
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 17:09
|
|
|
JayKay2010, thank you for your comments. As for the first one, you're right, I have already corrected the mistake. I hadn't checked the source topic correctly. About the "Mont Pincon" scenario, I think it's clear from the statement in the briefing: "The Axis hold the Medal unless any Objective hex is occupied by an Allied unit." And therefore it doesnt need to be included in erratas.
|
|
|
sdnative
Posts: 384
Registered:
February 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 18:32
|
|
| rasmussen81 wrote on Sun, 27 May 2012 12:25 |
| deemao wrote on Sun, 27 May 2012 23:19 |
As promised, here I present the Campaign Book vol. 1 Errata document:
http://cdn.daysofwonder.com/uploads/userpages/713928/_5549.p df
If you find any mistakes or misunderstandings, let me know and I will correct it. This applies especially to experienced players or campaigns designers themselves. At last I would like to thank Stevens for help.
The errata document for CB vol. 2 will be presented next Sunday.
|
Very nice work!! Those look great. There will be a lot of players (including me) happy to have the document to print out and tuck into the front of the book so that all the errors are in one place...and you made it look good while you were at it.
Thanks for your hard work!
|
Yes very professionally done!
|
|
|
Erik Uitdebroeck
Posts: 734
Registered:
December 2006
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 19:59
|
|
|
Thank you, Deemao. Very useful.
|
|
|
Antoi
Posts: 227
Registered:
March 2005
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Mon, 28 May 2012 20:10
|
|
well done!
this is very useful as i'am playing CB1 at he moment.
|
|
|
Kelly's Hero
Posts: 298
Registered:
April 2011
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Tue, 29 May 2012 18:18
|
|
|
I add my thanks to the others - very nicely done. I look forward to the CB2 sheet as well. Thanks for your contribution!
|
|
|
stevens
Posts: 2725
Registered:
February 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Wed, 30 May 2012 03:01
|
|
| Jaykay2010 wrote on Mon, 28 May 2012 08:42 |
This is excellent ... very handy to have in one place!
I may have spotted a slight error ...
The final correction in the Battle of Normandy Campaign, which mentions the extra point for a FOURTH objective ..
I wasn't aware you gained 3 points for only securing 3 objectives, as you state.
Currently in the book, it is 2 points for 3 objectives.
The missing objective, ie the 4th objective, is worth the additional point.
Therefore the statement:
''Right amount of points on the Objective track for Allies is 3, if they gain 3 or 4 objectives'', is not strictly correct as far as I can see?
Could anyone confirm this?
Cheers
Jim
|
Brummbar cleared this up:
http://www.daysofwonder.com/en/msg/?goto=227980#msg_227980
| Brummbar44 wrote on Sun, 02 October 2011 13:43 |
| stevens wrote on Sat, 01 October 2011 15:40 |
Not much motivation for taking the EXTRA objective?
|
Good point...Make it 3 then. Getting all of them would be difficult and it should count for something a little more.
Though, I'm still not sure why this even occurred? I was pretty attentive in this design. Something either slipped through or I had something else in mind and can't recall what it was now.
|
So missing box should state 3 points for 4 objectives.
deemao has it correct!
| Quote: |
p. 28 - Taking Caen
The last column in the Objective Track for Allies is missing: if you gain all 4 objectives, you will get 3 Victory Points.
|
[Updated on: Wed, 30 May 2012 03:03]
|
|
|
Jaykay2010
Posts: 485
Registered:
November 2009
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Wed, 30 May 2012 13:54
|
|
| stevens wrote on Wed, 30 May 2012 02:01 |
| Jaykay2010 wrote on Mon, 28 May 2012 08:42 |
This is excellent ... very handy to have in one place!
I may have spotted a slight error ...
The final correction in the Battle of Normandy Campaign, which mentions the extra point for a FOURTH objective ..
I wasn't aware you gained 3 points for only securing 3 objectives, as you state.
Currently in the book, it is 2 points for 3 objectives.
The missing objective, ie the 4th objective, is worth the additional point.
Therefore the statement:
''Right amount of points on the Objective track for Allies is 3, if they gain 3 or 4 objectives'', is not strictly correct as far as I can see?
Could anyone confirm this?
Cheers
Jim
|
Brummbar cleared this up:
http://www.daysofwonder.com/en/msg/?goto=227980#msg_227980
| Brummbar44 wrote on Sun, 02 October 2011 13:43 |
| stevens wrote on Sat, 01 October 2011 15:40 |
Not much motivation for taking the EXTRA objective?
|
Good point...Make it 3 then. Getting all of them would be difficult and it should count for something a little more.
Though, I'm still not sure why this even occurred? I was pretty attentive in this design. Something either slipped through or I had something else in mind and can't recall what it was now.
|
So missing box should state 3 points for 4 objectives.
deemao has it correct!
| Quote: |
p. 28 - Taking Caen
The last column in the Objective Track for Allies is missing: if you gain all 4 objectives, you will get 3 Victory Points.
|
|
Yes, this is now correct, thankyou Deemao for a great job.
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 03 June 2012 12:08
|
|
|
I must inform that due to absence of time, errata document for CB vol. 2 will be realesed one week later, next Sunday. Thank you for understanding.
|
|
|
rasmussen81
Posts: 6064
Registered:
July 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 03 June 2012 12:55
|
|
| deemao wrote on Sun, 03 June 2012 14:08 |
I must inform that due to absence of time, errata document for CB vol. 2 will be realesed one week later, next Sunday. Thank you for understanding.
|
No problem at all...we all know what you're going through! Life would be so fun if we could just dedicate as much time as we wanted to our hobbies and projects!
We're looking forward to seeing it whenever you have time to finish.
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
|
rasmussen81
Posts: 6064
Registered:
July 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sat, 09 June 2012 19:34
|
|
Very well done! Thanks for your time and effort to make this community and game better for everyone.
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Sat, 09 June 2012 23:15
|
|
Thanks Jesse for all your kind words, I think it helps a lot in this forum. I edited first message, so it now easier to download them. It is as well at my user page.
Feel free to spread this documents over internet and with your friends.
|
|
|
sdnative
Posts: 384
Registered:
February 2009
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Sun, 10 June 2012 08:09
|
|
|
Thank you so much!!!
|
|
|
Erik Uitdebroeck
Posts: 734
Registered:
December 2006
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 10 June 2012 09:03
|
|
Thank you very much Mr. Deemao.
Very helpful and convenient.
|
|
|
ad79
Posts: 773
Registered:
September 2007
|
|
Re:CB errata document (CB1)
|
Sun, 10 June 2012 22:58
|
|
An added info for Red Barricades.
When you use the Air Pack version of Red Barricades scenario as part of the Air Aces Campaign, Blitz Rules should be in effect.
The Air Pack version of the scenario doesn't mention Blitz rules so I think it belongs in the document.
The Eastern Front version has, correctly, Blitz Rules in effect.
|
|
|
Almilcar
Posts: 649
Registered:
November 2011
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Mon, 11 June 2012 12:53
|
|
Hello,
first, thanks to deemao for both documents.
One question I'd like to throw in here:
Page 6 - General Rules - Victory Event Roll Results
Last paragraph: "Starting with the player that moves first in the scenario you are about to begin, resolve the dice rolls using the following Events Table. Start with any infantry rolled and finish with any flags:"
However, the table that follows that paragraph starts with Infantry but ends with Grenades. Is it an errata?
Regards
|
|
|
rasmussen81
Posts: 6064
Registered:
July 2007
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Mon, 11 June 2012 13:09
|
|
| Almilcar wrote on Mon, 11 June 2012 14:53 |
Hello,
first, thanks to deemao for both documents.
One question I'd like to throw in here:
Page 6 - General Rules - Victory Event Roll Results
Last paragraph: "Starting with the player that moves first in the scenario you are about to begin, resolve the dice rolls using the following Events Table. Start with any infantry rolled and finish with any flags:"
However, the table that follows that paragraph starts with Infantry but ends with Grenades. Is it an errata?
Regards
|
No, it's not a mistake. The Grenade is resolved after everything because your apply the Grenade hits on yourself. So basically that paragraph is telling us what order to complete the events we do to the other player! The Grenade is seperate...if that makes sense? 
|
|
|
tank commander
Posts: 1788
Registered:
October 2004
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Thu, 28 June 2012 16:51
|
|
| rasmussen81 wrote on Mon, 11 June 2012 07:09 |
| Almilcar wrote on Mon, 11 June 2012 14:53 |
Hello,
first, thanks to deemao for both documents.
One question I'd like to throw in here:
Page 6 - General Rules - Victory Event Roll Results
Last paragraph: "Starting with the player that moves first in the scenario you are about to begin, resolve the dice rolls using the following Events Table. Start with any infantry rolled and finish with any flags:"
However, the table that follows that paragraph starts with Infantry but ends with Grenades. Is it an errata?
Regards
|
No, it's not a mistake. The Grenade is resolved after everything because your apply the Grenade hits on yourself. So basically that paragraph is telling us what order to complete the events we do to the other player! The Grenade is seperate...if that makes sense?
|
Your last paragraph is a bit confusing - it almost sounds like you are saying that thep layer who rolls a greande VE takes a loss from one of his units.
After a player rolls his VE rolls his opponent must remove a figure for each unit symbol rolled and retreat a unit of his choice for each Flag rolled. Note, unlike grenade rolls, there is no limit to how many hits can be applied to the same unit off of the unit symbol rolls. So for example, if one side has only has one 2 tank on the board and theo ther side rolls 2 Tank VE rolls, that units is lost and the opponent gets a medal - ouch!!
Grenade rolls are applied last - the difference here is that the player who rolled any gets to select the loss from a unit of his choice from his opponent's units. A really good way to knock artillery down to 1 fig before the battle begins.
|
|
|
Almilcar
Posts: 649
Registered:
November 2011
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Tue, 16 October 2012 12:48
|
|
|
Thanks for info, been busy last months, but I will try to add it to document.
|
|
|
gheintze
Posts: 860
Registered:
August 2004
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Tue, 16 October 2012 14:23
|
|
This is a great help to the community. Thanks, deemao!
Geoff
|
|
|
deemao
Posts: 159
Registered:
March 2011
|
|
|
Almilcar
Posts: 649
Registered:
November 2011
|
|
Re:CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
|
Thu, 25 October 2012 19:31
|
|
Deemao,
thanks for keeping this up to date.
Cheers,
Jaime
|
|
|
CBs errata documents (CB1 + CB2)
