| Author | Topic |
Fixpix
Posts: 76
Registered: April 2005
|
|
Shouting hill to hill
|
Fri, 09 September 2005 07:58
|
 |
Ok, sorry for beating up a dead horse, I've been trying to find out an official answer on the forums but I'm too lazzy to go through all the messages including "hill" in it's body
It goes like this: I'm on a hill, the enemy's on a hill, the hills are not adjacent, nor are they part of the same chain. Do I get the -1 die penalty or not? This situation happens quite often, and I heard both oppinions so far, if anybody remembers where's the official answer on this one, please post the link.
PS: for the record, I'd be inclined to use the -1 penalty, because of the word adjacent.
|
|
|
Brummbar44

Posts: 1120
Registered: June 2004
|
|
|
Rickka

Posts: 2
Registered: July 2005
|
|
|
Fixpix
Posts: 76
Registered: April 2005
|
|
Re:Shouting hill to hill
|
Sat, 10 September 2005 22:48
|
 |
@ Brummbar:
Thanks for clearing out the matter, it apears indeed to be so, you get no penalty for firing at the enemy situated on the same level with you whether you're on the same plateau or not. For some strange reason I was hung up on the word "adjacent" but obviously it wasn't a very good reason.
@ Rickka:
Thanks for replying but the question was about die reduction penalty for firing at units on different plateau, not LOS.
|
|
|