| Author | Topic |
tank commander

Posts: 1785
Registered: October 2004
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 13:05

|
 |
| rasmussen81 wrote on Wed, 25 January 2012 23:05 |
| stevens wrote on Thu, 26 January 2012 07:02 | So what you are saying Jesse is that to a JUNGLE FIGHTER, Jungle Terrain is treated as if it was an open Terrain Hex.
Is this correct?
Hence:
1. No movement restriction.
2. No battle restriction on entry
3. No dice reduction when attacking a unit on a Jungle Hex.
Just as if was an open Terrain hex.
|
I would have to look at my copy of the book and read through the Jungle Fighter rules carefully before saying for sure. Is that not the rules you understand for those troops?
EDIT: I'm at a bit of a disadvantage here because I'm at work and can't access my Player Aid or my copy of the Campaign Book. Can someone post the Rules we have for Jungle Fighters? Otherwise I'll just look them up when I get home and post my thoughts!
|
The way I READ the rule - and I could be wrong, is that there is no movement restriction when moving through a jungle hex or dice reduction when battling a unit in a jungle hex, however, I am not certain that the JUNGLE FIGHTER ignores the:
NO BATTLE ON ENTRY when not starting entry from an adjacent hex rule.
This might come up on an INFANTRY ASSAULT card where the attacking unit enters the jungle hex on his second movement. Normally this unit would not be able to battle, because he didnt enter immediatly from an adjacent hex. But if there is no battle entry restriction, then he could move two hexes into a jungle hex and battle. John clearly points this out in his text above.

I am like you though. It would be WAY SIMPLER if the battle restriction on entry was ALSO waived, though I don't think the wording in the book makes this absolutely clear. We need a definite ruling from DOW.
[Updated on: Thu, 26 January 2012 15:39]
|
|
|
Brummbar44

Posts: 1120
Registered: June 2004
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 16:15

|
 |
My intent on the Jungle Fighters was that they simply ignore all the effects of Jungle terrain as if it were not there (ie. it doesn't stop them, they may battle from it no matter if they moved 1 or 2 hexes into it and it provides no protection for opposing units on it being attacked by these units).
So in essence, yes Stevens sums it up best Jungle Fighters can treat Jungle terrain as if it were an Open terrain hex for all intents and purposes.
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
Brummbar44

Posts: 1120
Registered: June 2004
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 17:39

|
 |
|
Sorry...my answer wasn't quite accurate. For movement and battle restrictions, Jungle Fighters ignore the Jungle terrain effects...however, they can't really treat them like an Open terrain hex because Jungles still do block LOS (small but important clarification!).
|
|
|
Brummbar44

Posts: 1120
Registered: June 2004
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 17:43

|
 |
One other clarification on the Island Hoppers Grand campaign....
For the Marshall Islands campaign the last two scenarios (Engebi Landings and Capture of Parry) are technically Operation Catchpole and not Operation Flintlock as is listed in the book.
This is important for the Allied player to know as they must divide their reserve tokens between the two operations before starting play of the campaign.
|
|
|
nemesszili

Posts: 938
Registered: June 2008
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 18:07

|
 |
| Brummbar44 wrote on Thu, 26 January 2012 18:43 | One other clarification on the Island Hoppers Grand campaign....
For the Marshall Islands campaign the last two scenarios (Engebi Landings and Capture of Parry) are technically Operation Catchpole and not Operation Flintlock as is listed in the book.
This is important for the Allied player to know as they must divide their reserve tokens between the two operations before starting play of the campaign.
|
Thanks for the clarification! We've already played the last 3 campaigns... I hope I'll have enough free time to play the whole Grand Campaign!
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 6059
Registered: July 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 26 January 2012 20:43

|
 |
| Brummbar44 wrote on Thu, 26 January 2012 20:39 | Sorry...my answer wasn't quite accurate. For movement and battle restrictions, Jungle Fighters ignore the Jungle terrain effects...however, they can't really treat them like an Open terrain hex because Jungles still do block LOS (small but important clarification!).
|
Excellent!! That's what I suspected, but it's great to have the clarification. Thanks Malcolm.
|
|
|
GoboGobo

Posts: 47
Registered: April 2006
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Wed, 01 February 2012 22:29

|
 |
I've just made a first stab at playing the breakthrough scenarios of CB2. The last paragraph of the Special Rules left us a bit puzzled:
- It says "Once in full daylight", does that mean "When there is full daylight", or "Once only in full daylight" ? Or: can you spread the dropping over multiple attempts?
- "by playing an appropriate Command card", does that mean you give up that card and use the number of units to drop them? Or can you mix and match? For example play a Probe in the center, order 1 and drop 1.
- What about units on the move? Do they count for the drop too?
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 02 February 2012 00:59

|
 |
| GoboGobo wrote on Wed, 01 February 2012 16:29 | I've just made a first stab at playing the breakthrough scenarios of CB2. The last paragraph of the Special Rules left us a bit puzzled:
- It says "Once in full daylight", does that mean "When there is full daylight", or "Once only in full daylight" ? Or: can you spread the dropping over multiple attempts?
- "by playing an appropriate Command card", does that mean you give up that card and use the number of units to drop them? Or can you mix and match? For example play a Probe in the center, order 1 and drop 1.
- What about units on the move? Do they count for the drop too?
|
The drop can be over several turns. It cannot happen at all, however, until there is full daylight.
You have it correct. A probe allows you to drop 2 units OR drop one and Order one on the ground.
NO! On the move is only attributed to units on the ground, dropped units must be ordered.
|
|
|
tank commander

Posts: 1785
Registered: October 2004
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Thu, 02 February 2012 11:27

|
 |
Hel Scenario pg 77
Special Rules:
"The destroyer (Troops 12 - Destroyers) may move along river and lake hexes as if they were Ocean hexes."
The only problem with that statment is that the two lake hexes on the board are not connected to the river. Thus the destroyer (which starts on a river hex)cannot possibly move onto either lake hex. As that note may cause confusion, this should be mentioned in the errata.
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
Achtung Panzer

Posts: 946
Registered: December 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 09:31

|
 |
In the Drop in the Night: 101st scenario (CB#2 p.92) is the US unit shown already deployed in the Hedgerow hex a mistake?
Does it represent a unit from an earlier drop or should it really be a German unit, and if so, Specialised Unit or standard infantry?
|
|
|
Antoine

Posts: 1535
Registered: April 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 15:40

|
 |
|
It's not a mistake. It's a US paratrooper unit.
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 6059
Registered: July 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 19:09

|
 |
| Achtung Panzer wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 12:31 | Does it represent a unit from an earlier drop or should it really be a German unit, and if so, Specialised Unit or standard infantry?
|
It could be a unit from an earlier drop, or a pathfinder unit. Either way it is an Elite unit as seen from the arch over the icon of the unit...and you'll notice in the rules that all Allied Infantry are Elite in this battle which is why it isn't given a badge.
|
|
|
Achtung Panzer

Posts: 946
Registered: December 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 19:26

|
 |
| Antoine wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 14:40 | It's not a mistake. It's a US paratrooper unit.
|
Thanks Antione. And the same is true in the 82nd scenario (p. 90).
I just played the Dropped on the Contentin mini-campaign with a finla score of 27:27! Excellent scenarios.
|
|
|
Achtung Panzer

Posts: 946
Registered: December 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 19:29

|
 |
| rasmussen81 wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 18:09 |
| Achtung Panzer wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 12:31 | Does it represent a unit from an earlier drop or should it really be a German unit, and if so, Specialised Unit or standard infantry?
|
It could be a unit from an earlier drop, or a pathfinder unit. Either way it is an Elite unit as seen from the arch over the icon of the unit...and you'll notice in the rules that all Allied Infantry are Elite in this battle which is why it isn't given a badge.
|
Thanks Ras, it knew about the lack of badges. I guess I was expecting a reference to a "pathfinder unit" in the scenario text as the background talks about the initial night drop. My bad, as you say in the States
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 6059
Registered: July 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 19:33

|
 |
| Achtung Panzer wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 22:26 |
| Antoine wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 14:40 | It's not a mistake. It's a US paratrooper unit.
|
Thanks Antione. And the same is true in the 82nd scenario (p. 90).
I just played the Dropped on the Contentin mini-campaign with a finla score of 27:27! Excellent scenarios.
|
Yes, the same would be true of the Allied unit in the 82nd Airdrop scenario.
Sounds like a wonderfully close (and therefore tense and exciting) Campaign! I just love when something is close like that and anybody could win it.
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 6059
Registered: July 2007
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Mon, 06 February 2012 19:34

|
 |
| Achtung Panzer wrote on Mon, 06 February 2012 22:29 | Thanks Ras, it knew about the lack of badges. I guess I was expecting a reference to a "pathfinder unit" in the scenario text as the background talks about the initial night drop. My bad, as you say in the States
|
No worries! I'm glad to help and I'm glad you had fun with the scenario. I always liked the Air Drop from the base game, so it's fun to have some in a later expansion!
|
|
|
yangtze

Posts: 1837
Registered: July 2005
|
|
|
yangtze

Posts: 1837
Registered: July 2005
|
|
|
nemesszili

Posts: 938
Registered: June 2008
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
yangtze

Posts: 1837
Registered: July 2005
|
|
Re:Singapore Scenario Errata/Clarification
|
Mon, 13 February 2012 13:30

|
 |
Yes, of course, play as written.
I have amended my original post to remove confusing comments!
|
|
|
ppodahu

Posts: 8
Registered: January 2010
|
|
Re:Red Barricades Scenario - JU-88 Errata/Clarification
|
Sun, 26 February 2012 12:44

|
 |
Hi everybody,
we tried to play the CB2 version of red barricades factory (featuring Lydia Litvyak and her JAK), but we were a bit confused about the scenario specific Ju-88 rules.
Now I'm looking for some support in reading and undertanding of instructions.
1.)By the end
Does this wording mean that the Ju-88 joins the fight exactly in the 3rd turn, or does it mean that it has to be in the air by the and of the 3rd turn?(For example I can order it to flight already one turn before, and therefore I comlpete the requirement to be in the air in the 3rd turn)
2.)3rd turn
There is mentioned that axis air strike must be used by the end of 3rd turn to order the JU-88. Does it mean the 3rd turn of the AXIS player (means 5th turn of the game: axis-allies-axis-allies-axis), or the 3rd turn of the GAME?(means axis-allies-axis).
3.)Order for Ju-88
If I would like to avoid to much Air Check rolls, or I do not have cards to order Ju-88 in a turn when it is already in the air, is it allowed (as in case of other plans) to remove it from the battlefield, and later take it back, for example with a left recon card?Does it count in this case for Lt. Litvyak as a completed mission ('cause Ju-88 left the field before carpet bombing the factory)or, if this second Ju-88 flights over the factory and bombs that hexes, does the air ace fail her mission?
4.)Carpet bombing
"Note that the powerful carpet bombing ability of the JU-88 in this scenario may only be used once.
There's no reason why this need be the case in future scenarios, where, for example, the model might represent a whole formation of bombers. But in this scenario, and I would recommend also in normal play if the JU-88 is chosen by the Axis player, it's a one-shot capability." - by yangtze; Mon, 13 February 2012 12:17
Until yangtze's post (read by me today), I was sure that the special action of Ju-88 is allowed to be used in each turn, if it was ordered. Is it coming from rules that this is really just a one time action during the whole battle?(That is also an option that I misunderstand something, but I did not found this restriction.)
Thanks in advance!
As I am kind of newbies in the air, e.g. I have not too much Air Pack experiences, or my english is too poor to undertand these CB2 wordings....Therefore the answers might be obvious. In this case sorry for wasting your time, however your help will be very appriciated to solve the different arguments occured during our battle
|
|
|
tank commander

Posts: 1785
Registered: October 2004
|
|
Re:Red Barricades Scenario - JU-88 Errata/Clarification
|
Sun, 26 February 2012 14:51

|
 |
1) -- It can be brought on in Turns 1 or 2 and must be on board by Turn 3.
2) As the plane can only be ordered by the Axis player, it is by the end of his (Axis) 3rd turn.
3) The JU-88 sounds like a one shot deal and can only be brought on with the Air Power card the Axis player starts with.
|
|
|
yangtze

Posts: 1837
Registered: July 2005
|
|
Re:Red Barricades Scenario - JU-88 Errata/Clarification
|
Mon, 27 February 2012 01:21

|
 |
Hi ppodahu
Thanks for your comments.
In response, Tank Commander is correct on all counts.
The scenario special rules unfortunately omit mention of the one-shot nature of the JU-88's Carpet Bombing ability in this scenario. My apologies! In fact, I suspect there will be relatively little impact on the campaign if the scenario is simply played as written, but imo it's a more tense scenario if played as intended 
Additionally, my ruling would be that if the JU-88 leaves the board for any reason then Lydia has accomplished her primary mission. But there's nothing stopping you playing otherwise with the agreement of your opponent.
|
|
|
ppodahu

Posts: 8
Registered: January 2010
|
|
Re:Red Barricades Scenario - JU-88 Errata/Clarification
|
Mon, 27 February 2012 16:00

|
 |
yangtze and tank commander, thank you for the clarification!
I agree that in case of carpet bombing the one time option is more close to reality, because this modells better the historical missions of bomber squads (hit on one target with all bombs, no continuous strikes during the whole trip ).
Next time we will try to apply these rules.And let us see how do they work in action...
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
yangtze

Posts: 1837
Registered: July 2005
|
|
|
stevens

Posts: 2725
Registered: February 2007
|
|
|
Almilcar

Posts: 646
Registered: November 2011
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Sat, 28 April 2012 11:16

|
 |
I think this minor mistake has not been said yet:
Scenario #22 - Bakri
Special Rules: 3rd column "The British 3-figure 5/18th Garhwal Rifles Infantry unit is depleted (Troops 19 - Depleted Units)"
According to the Cards Compendium, Depleted Units is card Troops#22
|
|
|
Almilcar

Posts: 646
Registered: November 2011
|
|
|
Almilcar

Posts: 646
Registered: November 2011
|
|
|
bdgza

Posts: 173
Registered: February 2010
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Sat, 21 July 2012 23:07

|
 |
| Almilcar wrote on Sat, 28 April 2012 11:16 | I think this minor mistake has not been said yet:
Scenario #22 - Bakri
Special Rules: 3rd column "The British 3-figure 5/18th Garhwal Rifles Infantry unit is depleted (Troops 19 - Depleted Units)"
According to the Cards Compendium, Depleted Units is card Troops#22
|
Special Rules:
Special Weapon Asset rules (SWAs 4 - Special Weapon Assets) are in effect for the British unit equipped with Anti-Tank Guns (SWAs 2 - Anti-Tank Guns).
SWAs 4 goes together with SWAs 5, not 2.
|
|
|
Almilcar

Posts: 646
Registered: November 2011
|
|
|
deemao

Posts: 159
Registered: March 2011
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Tue, 21 August 2012 06:59

|
 |
Ok, I will check it later as Im too much busy these days. Thanks for message.
|
|
|
Almilcar

Posts: 646
Registered: November 2011
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Sat, 06 October 2012 14:10

|
 |
Fall of Poland - Battle of Warsaw
Setup Order list.
Missing the 3 forest tiles in the list.
|
|
|
deemao

Posts: 159
Registered: March 2011
|
|
Re:Campaign Book #2 Errata
|
Wed, 17 October 2012 07:08

|
 |
Hi Almicar, can you let me info about what page in CB2 is this Battle of Warsaw scenario? I dont have access to CBs right now. Thank you.
|
|
|