Memoire 44 - Jour J Memoire 44 - Jour J

Forums

Recherche
Forums » Memoir '44 - English » The Grand Slam compared:
Montrer: Messages du jour 
  
AuteurSujet
van Voort
Senior Member
Rikugun Taisa

Pages Perso
Messages: 638
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2011
The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 04:32
Belgian Open v French Open v WBC

These are the three major Memoir 44 competitions that I know of, and I have the good fortune to be able to compete in all 3 in the past year. If anyone has another tournament that they think should be up here, then please let me know; maybe I might even come to it.
In this review I hope to be able to compare and contrast the three, partially so that the rest of you can live vicariously through me but also as a practical guide to anyone considering running their own tournament.

Belgian Open
Started: 2012 1 tournament
Format: Swiss
Games: 6 over 2 days
When: November
Where: Louvain-la-Neuve – don't know if this will stay the same going forward
Players: 60

Format is pure Swiss, with 6 rounds. Players with the best record play each other. Players are only briefed on the scenario they will be playing a few minutes before, with a video introduction on the historical background and then the scenario itself. This helps occupy the time it takes for the organisers to enter the standings, generate the pairings for the next round and set up the maps.
Because you are playing blind, the ability to quickly read an unfamiliar map and a form a plan is highly tested here.
Scenarios are ready printed and setup with troops in the start positions and all relevant special cards available on or by the map.
The field is probably the most diverse, with players from the UK, Netherlands, France, Germany and Belgium. However the French field is probably stronger.
Organisation and support are very good, with a non-playing organising team, videos, spreadsheets, presentations.
Venue was a lecture theatre in the university.

French Open
Started: 208 5 tournaments
Format: Seeded semi Swiss
Games: 5 over two days + public final
When: June
Where: Paris, talk off returning to Normandy for 2014
Players: 100
Players are grouped by ability, so if you are an average player you should play one expert, one novice and 3 people about the same as you; in theory anyway. The details are opaque to me but they should be able to do this given that this is the longest running tournament with an established player base; so they know how good the regular players are. Who you will play is decided right at the start.
1/5th of the field plays each scenario at one time. The scenarios, except the final, are available in advance. Scenarios are ready printed and setup with troops in the start positions and all relevant special cards available on or by the map. Usually you set them up after you finish the previous round so they are ready for the next players.
Scoring is based on medal count, with extra medals for winning and holding objectives. Tie breaker is figures kept alive.
The field is probably the strongest overall, though less diverse than Belgium. This is mostly a French affair with some Belgians and a couple of Anglos. No Dutch or Germans this year to my knowledge.
Current venue is the museum of playing cards in Paris, the first was held in St Mere-Eglise.


WBC
Started: 2004 9 tournaments
Format: Knockout
Games: 6 in one day
When: July/August
Where: Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Players: 69

This is very different to the other two, which are M44 only events with a significant amount of official support. Here it is part of the larger WBC where over 100 games are played in tournament format, because of that the organisation and structure is very different. There is one GM and at least 2 assistants to run the event, and they all play, assistant GMs are there to rule in the game the GM is in. Neither pre-printed maps nor figures are provided; one rule at WBC is that you are only guaranteed to play if you bring a copy, in practice it is very rare for anyone to get turned away because they don't have one.
No decadent European 3 games a day format here, start at 0900, 6 knock out rounds scheduled for two hours each. In theory this should finish around 2100, but can and has run much later.
There is a Mulligan round the previous night that gives entry into the 2nd round, so all players can have at least two games if they wish. In the event of an odd number of participants in a round someone already knocked out plays as an eliminator.
Scenarios are chosen and available in advance, scoring is straight knock out with medal count and figures killed as the tie break.

Point by point:

Format:
I consider the Belgian format to be the best for a pure M44 tourney; the strongest and best performing players will play each other. It does need quite a slick organisation to run however.
Knockout format works fine for WBC because there is so much else to do there if you get knocked out and some people will only want to play a couple games anyway. I would not advise anyone to use it that way for a M44 only event, but it is perfect for what it is.
That WBC needs 6 games in 12 hours is possible because it's a convention where everyone is staying either in the venue itself or nearby, it would not work where people are commuting as in France or Belgium.
French format, this bugged me, and I have worked out what it is. The best players do not play each other by design, only by accident or in the final; instead they are competing to rack up medal counts against less good players. The only thing that is good about this format is the spectated final.



Field:
The French open has the largest and maybe the strongest field, but not a very diverse one.
WBC and Belgium are about the same size wise and in diversity of field, however I think Belgium is marginally stronger because as a pure M44 event it attracts M44 players, as opposed to WBC which has a diverse player base, but they are to play many games ofwhich M44 is one.



Venue:
Where are you playing and what is close?
The Playing Card museum in Paris is a pretty unique venue, and is in a major city. Belgium is in a university campus after the end of term, so everything is shut. On the other hand you get your mission briefings in a proper lecture hall. WBC is in a not-especially great hotel during a convention, but there is a lot there.


Location:
Is this easy to get to, is it expensive, can I justify that trip, does my non-playing SO have something to do while I play with my toy soldiers?

France:
You are in Paris which is both awesome and expensive, if you are in Normandy and your SO isn’t interested, less good for you
Belgium:
Belgium in November is not a top holiday destination, but there's things to do and it is one of the most fought over places in Europe, so if you are into military history, not a bad choice. I was able to go to Waterloo last year on my trip.
WBC:
Lancaster is not unpopular tourist destination so there is other stuff to do if necessary, really though you are coming for WBC. If you are coming across the Atlantic for that, might as well take some time in the US to do other stuff

Support:
Belgium and France have non-playing organising teams, pre-printed maps, pieces and cards provided, you get to take the maps home when you are done.
WBC does not have any of those, on the other hand a day of WBC is $20 (all you need for M44 unless you play the Mulligan) up to $100 for the whole thing. Belgium and France run to more than EUR 40.


Other:
WBC wins here, as you are taking part in a tradition of gaming going back to the origins of board war gaming and there is plenty else to do as well as play the competition. There are usually 4 or so Overlord demonstrations scheduled, as well as open games you can pick up. Amongst the other games with Touneys are other Richard Borg games like Command and Colours and Battle Cry as well as DOWs Ticket to Ride
Compared to that you can meet other players FtF for first time at France and Belgium, and maybe some of the personalities. I have seen Richard Borg at WBC and jdrommel at France.


Overall:

Belgium comes out top as the best all round event, the French Open is let down by the format but supported by other factors to tie with WBC.



[Mis à jour le: Thu, 27 June 2013 22:47]

      
van Voort
Senior Member
Rikugun Taisa

Pages Perso
Messages: 638
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2011
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 04:34
	         Belgium	France	WBC
Format	               10	2	8
Size of Field	        3	5	3
Diversity of Field	4	2	4
Strength of Field	5	5	3
Venue	                2	4	3
Location              	7	8	7
Support	                4	5	0
Other	                1	2	5
	               72%	66%	66%

[Mis à jour le: Thu, 27 June 2013 04:35]

      
van Voort
Senior Member
Rikugun Taisa

Pages Perso
Messages: 638
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2011
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 04:38
Nicer version of this can be found here:

https://sites.google.com/site/wilphe/m44/grand-slam
      
sam1812
Senior Member
Brigadier General

Pages Perso
Messages: 2177
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2006
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 07:22
Thank you for that fascinating comparison, van Voort. Some day, I'd love to try the French or Belgian Open, but I don't know whether the logistics will ever work out.

As GM of the WBC tournament, I can say that we do, indeed, use the single elimination format because we're part of a much larger gaming convention. A fair percentage of our participants are casual players who have their match or two, and then move on to another tournament. (A few years ago, we had one poor fellow who was hoping to leave around noon, but he inconveniently made it all the way to the semi-finals.) If I were organizing a Memoir-only event, it probably would be Swiss System or something similar.

Unlike the French Open, which gets brand-new scenarios from jdrommel every year, I vary the source of the scenarios. In my first year, I had an international panel of experts vote on the scenarios. In 2011, we had the world premier of the Crete Campaign. Last year, it was scenarios chosen by the previous year's champion, JJAZ. (He chose 6 scenarios that took place near his home in Belgium.) This year, I asked the most experienced Memoir Online player, Nygaard, to choose, and most of the scenarios he selected are very, very familiar ones. (I hope lots of people will come and play as a result!) My one ironclad rule is that, since I play in the tournament, I don't choose the scenarios -- and after the scenarios are chosen, I don't practice them until they're publicly announced.

By the way, I should point out one minor typo in your writeup on the WBC tournament: "you are only guaranteed to play if you bring a copy" of the game. Smile
      
van Voort
Senior Member
Rikugun Taisa

Pages Perso
Messages: 638
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2011
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 08:48
Duh

Typo corrected
      
JJAZ
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

Pages Perso
Messages: 585
Enregistré(e) en :
May 2008
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 17:32
Hi Sir.
Well i did all 3 of those events also with different success Smile
What i think is all 3 are great and hard to compare its like Roland Garros and Wimbledon and the US or Australian open in tennis they are each nice to win lol.
At the WBC considering Sam E is almost alone to organize i think he does a great job, also in my opinion its the way the game was designed play sides to win the match and no time limit.
The After report from Sam writes like a novel too.

The French i agree on all you write although i got 2 matches vs slow players and lost virtually a good ranking because both games ended at about 4 medals instead of 6 which is a very bad thing if you try to get in the final.


The Belgian open which had only 1 event so far, was run very well and as you pointed out also well documented so well done also Belgium.
As Belgium is located between Holland France and Germany its maybe logical they have more nations that attend the tournament.

If i had to choose i would prefer the WBC way to advance through to the final, the French musee des cartes as the venue and the Belgian open for the scenario introductions Smile

J.
      
van Voort
Senior Member
Rikugun Taisa

Pages Perso
Messages: 638
Enregistré(e) en :
August 2011
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Thu, 27 June 2013 22:50
Well i did all 3 of those events also with different success

I think anyone who does this deserves a special medal.


I suspect also that Belgium will continue to grow and get a diverse player base because it's relatively cheap compared to Paris
      
JJAZ
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

Pages Perso
Messages: 585
Enregistré(e) en :
May 2008
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Fri, 28 June 2013 07:07
van Voort wrote on Thu, 27 June 2013 22:50

Well i did all 3 of those events also with different success

I think anyone who does this deserves a special medal.

I suspect also that Belgium will continue to grow and get a diverse player base because it's relatively cheap compared to Paris


I got a medal its hanging on my office wall Smile

Maybe a lot depends on participants to to make a great tournament.
j.

[Mis à jour le: Fri, 28 June 2013 07:08]

      
Antoi
Senior Member
Ramener les gars à la maison

Pages Perso
Messages: 527
Enregistré(e) en :
March 2005
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Fri, 28 June 2013 10:48
JJAZ wrote on Fri, 28 June 2013 07:07

van Voort wrote on Thu, 27 June 2013 22:50

Well i did all 3 of those events also with different success

I think anyone who does this deserves a special medal.

I suspect also that Belgium will continue to grow and get a diverse player base because it's relatively cheap compared to Paris


I got a medal its hanging on my office wall Smile

Maybe a lot depends on participants to to make a great tournament.
j.


The first tournament I Organised only had 10 participants, but I think it was great Laughing
      
JJAZ
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

Pages Perso
Messages: 585
Enregistré(e) en :
May 2008
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Fri, 28 June 2013 18:04
Sure if you all had fun its the only thing that matters Antoi.
      
stevens
Senior Member
Victoire à Omaha

Pages Perso
Messages: 2937
Enregistré(e) en :
February 2007
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Fri, 28 June 2013 23:30
JJAZ wrote on Fri, 28 June 2013 12:04

Sure if you all had fun its the only thing that matters Antoi.

Truer words were never spoken.
      
Antoi
Senior Member
Ramener les gars à la maison

Pages Perso
Messages: 527
Enregistré(e) en :
March 2005
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Sat, 29 June 2013 23:49
JJAZ wrote on Fri, 28 June 2013 18:04

Sure if you all had fun its the only thing that matters Antoi.


indeed, If we all only play to win, we should better stop playing at all. Rolling Eyes
      
Jeronimon
Senior Member
Brigadier

Pages Perso
Messages: 935
Enregistré(e) en :
November 2007
Re:The Grand Slam compared: Mon, 15 July 2013 09:43
I have only been to the Belgian Open last year, and like Van Voort enjoyed it thouroughly. Going on his report I am curious as to how participating in the other two tournaments would be and will try to fit the French into my schedule next year.

I can guarantee that the Belgian Open 2013 will have more dutch players than last year. This judging by the enthusiasm in the dutch M44 community. Largely thanks to Antoi for getting us together and organizing M44 playing days.

We are already planning the carpooling. Very Happy

      
    
Sujet précédent:Saint-Aignan de Cramesnil (#4588) - Historical error?
Sujet suivant:Torbung (EP Bonus Scenarios)
Aller au forum: