| Auteur | Sujet |
AngryMarine

Messages: 39
Enregistré(e) en : January 2012
|
|
|
AngryMarine

Messages: 39
Enregistré(e) en : January 2012
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Messages: 6066
Enregistré(e) en : July 2007
|
|
Re:Blocking is an essential part of the game.
|
Mon, 24 December 2012 13:58

|
 |
In these situations, I would probably simply write it off and keep enjoying the game! Some people like to play games with absolutely no blocking (and even get upset if you needed to route and take it before they can) but it is part of the game.
It sounds like you got off easy with the "Mad Blocker" comment!! I've heard of people calling players a lot worse!
|
|
|
AngryMarine

Messages: 39
Enregistré(e) en : January 2012
|
|
Re:Blocking is an essential part of the game.
|
Mon, 24 December 2012 14:14

|
 |
|
|
|
cihant
Messages: 5
Enregistré(e) en : December 2012
|
|
|
AngryMarine

Messages: 39
Enregistré(e) en : January 2012
|
|
Re:Blocking is an essential part of the game.
|
Fri, 28 December 2012 16:15

|
 |
Yeah! Blocking is a separate skill. If you are not good at it you can do more harm to yourself than to your opponent.
I can also compare blocking with the Dark Side of the Force. It can be very powerful, but if you start every game with the intention to win by blocking the soul of the game is lost. But there is no balance without blocking.
|
|
|
DAC cazaron
Messages: 50
Enregistré(e) en : May 2012
|
|
Re:Blocking is an essential part of the game.
|
Sat, 29 December 2012 22:34
|
 |
I personally get very frustrated when people whine about being blocked. It happens, it's deliberately a part of the game. People who join games i create and then insult me for 'blocking them' irritate me. I never advertise my games to be non-blocking, if you want a game without blocking, make your own.
That said, i completely and utterly agree with the OP. People just don't seem to be able to handle losing. I don't like losing at the best of times, and sometimes a block leaves me seething cause i'll lose... However, i realise that it's MY fault they were able to block it in the first place. If i had played seattle-vancouver earlier, it would never have been blocked.
I am in agreement with the 'players are not equal from the start' comment also. Say, for instance, i got denver/el paso and kansas city/ houston as my starting tickets. In a no blocks game, if my opponent pulls seattle/new york and vancouver/montreal, say, i've lost no matter what, cause the whole element of strategising to win is nullified by the 'no blocking' clause. If i so much as play a train in the top of america, i am criticised for being a blocker? It just doesn't make sense.
Ultimately, it's a losing thing. If someone is so intolerant of losing a game of chance, that they swear and whine and carry on about you 'cheating' cause you blocked them, they're not worth playing with.
|
|
|