Author | Topic |
Major Duncan

Posts: 270
Registered: July 2004
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 26 May 2021 11:51

|
 |
Thanks
|
|
|
Erik Uitdebroeck

Posts: 1313
Registered: December 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Thu, 27 May 2021 19:45

|
 |
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
SeahawksKid12

Posts: 12
Registered: August 2019
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Fri, 25 June 2021 07:55

|
 |
New Remembrance Scenario up. Finally there is an official scenario with armored cars
|
|
|
SeahawksKid12

Posts: 12
Registered: August 2019
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Fri, 25 June 2021 20:09

|
 |
Quick Question for the June remembrance scenario, are the commissar rules in effect. This is early war Red Army right?
|
|
|
Dam the Man

Posts: 13
Registered: November 2008
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Fri, 30 July 2021 16:51

|
 |
Not sure when the July scenario was posted, but the battle is from July 15, 1941.
|
|
|
fluffy1

Posts: 4
Registered: August 2021
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Sat, 04 September 2021 23:58

|
 |
Where is the September remembrance scenario?
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 8514
Registered: July 2007
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Mon, 06 September 2021 20:14

|
 |
fluffy1 wrote on Sat, 04 September 2021 14:58 | Where is the September remembrance scenario?
|
It hasn't been released yet
|
|
|
Arsenal2013

Posts: 2
Registered: October 2013
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 15 September 2021 20:05

|
 |
The September scenario has just been released.
But can anyone tell me where the Paradrop zone(s) should be marked if I want to play the scenario in Vassal?
Thanks.
|
|
|
jdrommel

Posts: 1235
Registered: March 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 15 September 2021 21:03

|
 |
Hello,
Historically, the paradrop zone is around Hill 57,3. There is a little memorial of the operation there.
|
|
|
jdrommel

Posts: 1235
Registered: March 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 15 September 2021 22:13

|
 |
You can see some photos of this scenario on the French Forum.
|
|
|
Arsenal2013

Posts: 2
Registered: October 2013
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Thu, 16 September 2021 00:33

|
 |
Merci beaucoup!
I have the scenario built in Vassal so now I can just add the finishing touch of the drop zone.
|
|
|
magick

Posts: 114
Registered: December 2004
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 20 October 2021 17:41

|
 |
October scenario is out now
|
|
|
Stalonowitz

Posts: 4
Registered: April 2011
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Tue, 21 December 2021 21:36

|
 |
New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island
|
|
|
Achtung Panzer

Posts: 1186
Registered: December 2007
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 22 December 2021 15:38

|
 |
Stalonowitz wrote on Tue, 21 December 2021 20:36 | New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island
|
And it's an Overlord too! Merci JDRommel.
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 8514
Registered: July 2007
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Thu, 23 December 2021 01:30

|
 |
Achtung Panzer wrote on Wed, 22 December 2021 06:38 |
Stalonowitz wrote on Tue, 21 December 2021 20:36 | New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island
|
And it's an Overlord too! Merci JDRommel.
|
Not just an Overlord, but an Overlord where the two sides aren't actually linked. So you can't just send reinforcements to the other side, unless you're using the New Flight Plan!
Have fun.
|
|
|
Erik Uitdebroeck

Posts: 1313
Registered: December 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Mon, 27 December 2021 12:12

|
 |
Hello all,
Thanks JD for all your work.
Still one question:
Can a unit fire from the one side to the other?
(I suppose not, but anyway ...)
Bye and thanks,
Erik.
|
|
|
jdrommel

Posts: 1235
Registered: March 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Fri, 31 December 2021 09:40

|
 |
Hello Erik,
No it can't. No unit can fire on the other board. The only thing permitted is the move of an airplane from a board to the other, that's all.

Jdrommel.
|
|
|
Erik Uitdebroeck

Posts: 1313
Registered: December 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Mon, 03 January 2022 12:02

|
 |
Thank you for the quick answer.
|
|
|
Major Duncan

Posts: 270
Registered: July 2004
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Tue, 11 January 2022 15:50

|
 |
Really enjoying these scenarios thanks.
Cavallero's Failed offensive and Keren Pt I are closely balanced and I've played several exiting solo games.
The Relief of Tobruk is another disappointing example of the text giving the impression of a Commonwealth (New Zealand in this case) defeat. A detailed New Zealand account shows that their initial attack gained two thirds of the hill and that the subsequent German attack reduced those gains to half the hill. Casualties on both sides were about even. Point 175 was captured the next day (24th), and held until retaken by the Italian Ariete Armoured Division on the 29th.
Also, the maps of the battle show the road (Trigh Capuzzo) as running totally to the north of the battle, not through the middle of it. I would remove the road from the scenario.
|
|
|
Major Duncan

Posts: 270
Registered: July 2004
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Tue, 31 May 2022 18:06

|
 |
Thanks for the new scenario. I was reading about this recently. An amazing offensive against a numerically superior defending force on a limited front. The Axis did everything right and the Soviets got everything wrong.
Line three of the Victory Conditions should read:
"An Axis unit that moves off the battlefield"
|
|
|
Dam the Man

Posts: 13
Registered: November 2008
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 22 June 2022 21:46

|
 |
Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.
|
|
|
rasmussen81

Posts: 8514
Registered: July 2007
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Wed, 22 June 2022 22:02

|
 |
Dam the Man wrote on Wed, 22 June 2022 12:46 | Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.
|
I don't believe it's a typo. If you remember from the historical background, the Allies were busting out of their pocket to escape through enemy lines. I believe the mines are there to limit movement a bit and represent the edge of the pocket the Free French were leaving.
|
|
|
jdrommel

Posts: 1235
Registered: March 2006
|
Re:Remembrance Scenarios
|
Thu, 23 June 2022 07:52
|
 |
rasmussen81 écrit le Wed, 22 June 2022 22:02 |
Dam the Man wrote on Wed, 22 June 2022 12:46 | Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.
|
I don't believe it's a typo. If you remember from the historical background, the Allies were busting out of their pocket to escape through enemy lines. I believe the mines are there to limit movement a bit and represent the edge of the pocket the Free French were leaving.
|
Rassmussen 81 is totally right.
|
|
|