Heat: Pedal to the Metal Heat: Pedal to the Metal

Forums

Search
Forums » Memoir '44 - English » Remembrance Scenarios
Show: Today's Posts 
  
AuthorTopic
Major Duncan
Senior Member

User Pages
Posts: 270
Registered:
July 2004
  Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 26 May 2021 11:51
Thanks
      
Erik Uitdebroeck
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

User Pages
Posts: 1313
Registered:
December 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Thu, 27 May 2021 19:45
Thank you very much.
      
SeahawksKid12
Junior Member
Starshiy Leytenant

User Pages
Posts: 12
Registered:
August 2019
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Fri, 25 June 2021 07:55
New Remembrance Scenario up. Finally there is an official scenario with armored cars Surprised
      
SeahawksKid12
Junior Member
Starshiy Leytenant

User Pages
Posts: 12
Registered:
August 2019
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Fri, 25 June 2021 20:09
Quick Question for the June remembrance scenario, are the commissar rules in effect. This is early war Red Army right?
      
Dam the Man
Junior Member

User Pages
Posts: 13
Registered:
November 2008
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Fri, 30 July 2021 16:51
Not sure when the July scenario was posted, but the battle is from July 15, 1941.
      
fluffy1
Junior Member
Cadet

User Pages
Posts: 4
Registered:
August 2021
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Sat, 04 September 2021 23:58
Where is the September remembrance scenario?
      
rasmussen81
DoW Content Provider
Lake Express

User Pages
Posts: 8514
Registered:
July 2007
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Mon, 06 September 2021 20:14
fluffy1 wrote on Sat, 04 September 2021 14:58

Where is the September remembrance scenario?


It hasn't been released yet
      
Arsenal2013
Junior Member
Second Lieutenant

User Pages
Posts: 2
Registered:
October 2013
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 15 September 2021 20:05
The September scenario has just been released.

But can anyone tell me where the Paradrop zone(s) should be marked if I want to play the scenario in Vassal?

Thanks.
      
jdrommel
DoW Content Provider
FFM44 Bureau

User Pages
Posts: 1235
Registered:
March 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 15 September 2021 21:03
Hello,
Historically, the paradrop zone is around Hill 57,3. There is a little memorial of the operation there. Cool
      
jdrommel
DoW Content Provider
FFM44 Bureau

User Pages
Posts: 1235
Registered:
March 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 15 September 2021 22:13

You can see some photos of this scenario on the French Forum.
      
Arsenal2013
Junior Member
Second Lieutenant

User Pages
Posts: 2
Registered:
October 2013
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Thu, 16 September 2021 00:33
Merci beaucoup!

I have the scenario built in Vassal so now I can just add the finishing touch of the drop zone.
      
magick
Senior Member
Lieutenant

User Pages
Posts: 114
Registered:
December 2004
  Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 20 October 2021 17:41
Very Happy Smile Surprised Shocked Cool October scenario is out now Razz
      
Stalonowitz
Junior Member
First Lieutenant

User Pages
Posts: 4
Registered:
April 2011
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Tue, 21 December 2021 21:36
New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island
      
Achtung Panzer
Senior Member
Leutnant

User Pages
Posts: 1186
Registered:
December 2007
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 22 December 2021 15:38
Stalonowitz wrote on Tue, 21 December 2021 20:36

New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island

And it's an Overlord too! Merci JDRommel.
      
rasmussen81
DoW Content Provider
Lake Express

User Pages
Posts: 8514
Registered:
July 2007
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Thu, 23 December 2021 01:30
Achtung Panzer wrote on Wed, 22 December 2021 06:38

Stalonowitz wrote on Tue, 21 December 2021 20:36

New remembrance scenario - December 1941: Landing on Wake Island

And it's an Overlord too! Merci JDRommel.



Not just an Overlord, but an Overlord where the two sides aren't actually linked. So you can't just send reinforcements to the other side, unless you're using the New Flight Plan!

Have fun.
      
Erik Uitdebroeck
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

User Pages
Posts: 1313
Registered:
December 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Mon, 27 December 2021 12:12
Hello all,

Thanks JD for all your work.
Still one question:
Can a unit fire from the one side to the other?
(I suppose not, but anyway ...)

Bye and thanks,
Erik.
      
jdrommel
DoW Content Provider
FFM44 Bureau

User Pages
Posts: 1235
Registered:
March 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Fri, 31 December 2021 09:40
Hello Erik,

No it can't. No unit can fire on the other board. The only thing permitted is the move of an airplane from a board to the other, that's all.

Smile
Jdrommel.
      
Erik Uitdebroeck
Senior Member
Lieutenant Colonel

User Pages
Posts: 1313
Registered:
December 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Mon, 03 January 2022 12:02
Thank you for the quick answer.
      
Major Duncan
Senior Member

User Pages
Posts: 270
Registered:
July 2004
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Tue, 11 January 2022 15:50
Really enjoying these scenarios thanks.

Cavallero's Failed offensive and Keren Pt I are closely balanced and I've played several exiting solo games.

The Relief of Tobruk is another disappointing example of the text giving the impression of a Commonwealth (New Zealand in this case) defeat. A detailed New Zealand account shows that their initial attack gained two thirds of the hill and that the subsequent German attack reduced those gains to half the hill. Casualties on both sides were about even. Point 175 was captured the next day (24th), and held until retaken by the Italian Ariete Armoured Division on the 29th.

Also, the maps of the battle show the road (Trigh Capuzzo) as running totally to the north of the battle, not through the middle of it. I would remove the road from the scenario.
      
Major Duncan
Senior Member

User Pages
Posts: 270
Registered:
July 2004
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Tue, 31 May 2022 18:06
Thanks for the new scenario. I was reading about this recently. An amazing offensive against a numerically superior defending force on a limited front. The Axis did everything right and the Soviets got everything wrong.

Line three of the Victory Conditions should read:
"An Axis unit that moves off the battlefield"
      
Dam the Man
Junior Member

User Pages
Posts: 13
Registered:
November 2008
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 22 June 2022 21:46
Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.
      
rasmussen81
DoW Content Provider
Lake Express

User Pages
Posts: 8514
Registered:
July 2007
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Wed, 22 June 2022 22:02
Dam the Man wrote on Wed, 22 June 2022 12:46

Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.


I don't believe it's a typo. If you remember from the historical background, the Allies were busting out of their pocket to escape through enemy lines. I believe the mines are there to limit movement a bit and represent the edge of the pocket the Free French were leaving.
      
jdrommel
DoW Content Provider
FFM44 Bureau

User Pages
Posts: 1235
Registered:
March 2006
Re:Remembrance Scenarios Thu, 23 June 2022 07:52
rasmussen81 écrit le Wed, 22 June 2022 22:02

Dam the Man wrote on Wed, 22 June 2022 12:46

Question about the latest scenario "Bir Hakeim, Act 4". Is there a typo that Allied player lays out the minefields? Axis seem to be defending and trying the Allies from escaping, so if the Allies lay them out, they would be useless, no? Other than making the Allied unit moving in stop.


I don't believe it's a typo. If you remember from the historical background, the Allies were busting out of their pocket to escape through enemy lines. I believe the mines are there to limit movement a bit and represent the edge of the pocket the Free French were leaving.



Rassmussen 81 is totally right. Smile
      
Pages (2): [ «  <  1  2 ]     
Previous Topic:Important - Naming conventions for M44 scenario titles
Goto Forum: